Why the study?
Identifying high-risk patients for ICU admission following intra-abdominal surgery is crucial, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Does the surgical apgar score combined with ASA classification (SASA) improve prediction of ICU admission within 48 hours in patients following intra-abdominal surgery compared to SAS alone?
Does the surgical apgar score combined with ASA classification (SASA) improve prediction of ICU admission within 48 hours in patients following intra-abdominal surgery compared to SAS alone?
The SASA score demonstrates high predictive accuracy for ICU admission following intra-abdominal surgery, outperforming the SAS alone.
May support SASA for ICU prediction after intra-abdominal surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Background: Identifying high-risk patients for intensive care unit (ICU) admission after intra-abdominal surgery is crucial, especially in resource-limited settings. This study evaluates the predictive accuracy of the surgical apgar score combined with ASA classification (SASA) for ICU admission within 48 hours. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 242 patients (24 ICU admissions, 9.9%) was analyzed, with a mean age of 58.25 years (standard deviation = 15.41) and 137 males (56.6%). The performance of SAS and SASA was assessed using ROC curve and calibration analysis. Results: SASA outperformed SAS (area under the receiver operating characteristic [auROC]: 0.9483 vs. 0.8772). An optimal SASA cutoff score of 13 provided 83.33% sensitivity and 94.95% specificity for ICU admission. ASA classification, open abdominal surgery, operative duration, hemodynamic instability, and blood loss were significant ICU predictors (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SASA demonstrates superior predictive accuracy for ICU admission and enhances perioperative risk stratification. Prospective studies are recommended to validate its role in predicting morbidity and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bumrungchatudom et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: