Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals wide variation in 10-year cumulative stroke recurrence rates, suggesting that methodological discrepancies and evolving secondary prevention alter reported estimates.
The cumulative risk of recurrence varies greatly up to 10 years. This may be explained by differences in case mix and changes in secondary prevention over time However, methodological differences are likely to play an important role and consensus on definitions would improve future comparability of estimates and characterization of groups of stroke survivors at increased risk of recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: