Why the study?
Does the 2D-XC method improve the reproducibility of estimating aortic pulse wave velocity compared to established TT or FOOT methods?
Does the 2D-XC method improve the reproducibility of estimating aortic pulse wave velocity compared to established TT or FOOT methods?
The 2D-XC method using cross-correlation on 2D PCMR velocity data provides a more reproducible approach for estimating aortic pulse wave velocity compared to traditional methods.
2D-XC improves aortic PWV reproducibility; leaves open impact on risk stratification or outcomes.
2D-XC is a more reproducible method than either the established TT or FOOT methods to estimate the aortic PWV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fielden et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: