Why the study?
Does the 2D-XC method improve the reproducibility of estimating aortic pulse wave velocity compared to established TT or FOOT methods?
Does the 2D-XC method improve the reproducibility of estimating aortic pulse wave velocity compared to established TT or FOOT methods?
The 2D-XC method using cross-correlation on 2D PCMR velocity data provides a more reproducible approach for estimating aortic pulse wave velocity compared to traditional methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
2D-XC improves aortic PWV reproducibility; leaves open impact on risk stratification or outcomes.
Fielden et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: