Rate and nature of complications with leadless transcatheter pacemakers compared with transvenous pacemakers: results from an Italian multicentre large population analysis

Figures

• 

  Figure 1. Panel A: Freedom from first device-related complication in overall study population, comparison between L-PM and T-PM patients. Panel B: Freedom from early device-related complications in L-PM and T-PM groups. Panel C: Freedom from late device-related complications in L-PM and T-PM groups. HR, hazard ratio; L-PM, leadless intracardiac pacemaker; T-PM, conventional transvenous pacemaker.

• 

  Figure 2. Panel A: Incidence of device-related complications during follow-up in overall study population, comparison between L-PM and T-PM patients. Panel B: Incidence of device-related complications during follow-up in L-PM and T-PM matched groups. L-PM, leadless intracardiac pacemaker; T-PM, conventional transvenous pacemaker.

• 

  Figure 3. Panel A: Freedom from first device-related complication in L-PM and T-PM matched groups. Panel B: Freedom from early complications in L-PM and T-PM matched groups. Panel C: Freedom from late complications in L-PM and T-PM matched groups. HR, hazard ratio; L-PM, leadless intracardiac pacemaker; T-PM, conventional transvenous pacemaker.