Why the study?
Does exercise electrocardiography have similar efficacy and better cost-effectiveness compared to exercise echocardiography in intermediate-risk women with suspected coronary artery disease?
Does exercise electrocardiography have similar efficacy and better cost-effectiveness compared to exercise echocardiography in intermediate-risk women with suspected coronary artery disease?
Exercise ECG is a cost-saving alternative with similar efficacy to exercise echocardiography in intermediate-risk women with suspected CAD who can exercise.
Ex-ECG offers similar efficacy with cost savings versus ESE in intermediate-risk women able to exercise; extends RCT evidence for exercise-based testing in suspected CAD.
In intermediate-risk women who are able to exercise, Ex-ECG had similar efficacy to an ESE strategy, with higher resource utilization whilst providing cost savings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurunathan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: