Why the study?
The clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation for VT and its effect on LV systolic function in patients with CHF and reduced or moderately reduced LVEF needed to be determined.
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation improve clinical status and left ventricular systolic function in patients with ischemic chronic heart failure and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia?
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation improve clinical status and left ventricular systolic function in patients with ischemic chronic heart failure and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia?
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction is associated with improved functional status and reverse left ventricular remodeling at 1 year.
Objective. To determine clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and effect of interventional treatment of VT on left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced and moderately reduced LV ejection fraction (EF) within 12 months after intervention. Material and methods. RFA of ventricular tachycardia was performed in 47 patients (41 men (87.2%), 6 women (12.8%), median age 65 [57; 71] years) with ischemic CHF NYHA class II—III, LV EF <50% and persistent paroxysms of monomorphic VT. We analyzed laboratory and instrumental parameters at baseline and 12 months after intervention. Results. Efficiency of RFA was 85% throughout a year. Clinical improvement was associated with CHF class decrease and 6MWT distance increment from 320 [200; 340] to 411.5 [340; 461.3] m (p<0.001). NT-proBNP significantly decreased from 756 [493.5; 1106] to 269.5 [122.8; 769.8] pg/mL after RFA (p=0.006). LVEF increased from 40 [34; 46] to 47% [35; 52] (p<0.001). Conclusion. RFA is effective for ventricular rhythm disturbances. This procedure improves functional status of patients with ischemic CHF and contributes to reverse LV remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khachirov et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: