Why the study?
What are the diagnostic tools, cost-effectiveness, and correlation with embolic events for silent atrial fibrillation?
What are the diagnostic tools, cost-effectiveness, and correlation with embolic events for silent atrial fibrillation?
This review highlights the uncertainties surrounding silent AF, particularly the lack of temporal relationship with stroke and the unclear cost-effectiveness of continuous ECG monitoring in unselected populations.
Uncertainties around silent AF monitoring persist in practice; leaves open causal links to stroke and cost-effectiveness of broad ECG screening.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Silent AF is an asymptomatic form of AF incidentally diagnosed during a routine test or manifesting as an arrhythmia-related complication. Although recent trials have clearly demonstrated that patients with sub-clinical AF are at increased risk of stroke, the real incidence of this form of AF is still unknown. In fact, studies about silent AF had been performed only in specific subgroups of patients such as those with implantable cardiac devices, with recent cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and recently undergoing AF ablation. Continuous ECG-monitoring in patients without implantable cardiac devices may improve silent AF detection but its cost-effectiveness actually is not well established in all kind of patients. Moreover, recent data have revealed that only a small number of these patients may have sub-clinical AF within the month prior to their stroke suggesting a lack of temporal relationship between the stroke and the AF episode. This paper will review available data on different diagnostic tools for silent AF detection with a focus on their cost-effectiveness, analyzing the direct correlation between the arrhythmia and embolic events, and discussing areas of uncertainty where further research is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbarossa et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: