Why the study?
Does a 6-month additional cardiac telerehabilitation programme improve long-term peak aerobic capacity and cost-efficiency in cardiac patients?
Does a 6-month additional cardiac telerehabilitation programme improve long-term peak aerobic capacity and cost-efficiency in cardiac patients?
A 6-month transitional cardiac telerehabilitation program provides persistent, cost-effective improvements in aerobic capacity up to 2 years post-intervention compared to standard care.
Sustains superior aerobic capacity with cost-effectiveness at 2 years; extends RCT evidence for transitional cardiac telerehabilitation.
Background Finding innovative and cost-efficient care strategies that induce long-term health benefits in cardiac patients constitutes a big challenge today. The aim of this Telerehab III follow-up study was to assess whether a 6-month additional cardiac telerehabilitation programme could induce long-term health benefits and remain cost-efficient after the tele-intervention ended. Methods and results A total of 126 cardiac patients first completed the multicentre, randomised controlled telerehabilitation trial (Telerehab III, time points t₀ to t₁). They consequently entered the follow-up study (t₁) with evaluations 2 years later (t₂). A quantitative analysis of peak aerobic capacity (VO₂ peak, primary endpoint), international physical activity questionnaire self-reported physical activity and HeartQoL quality of life (secondary endpoints) was performed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. Even though a decline in VO₂ peak (24 ± 8 ml/[min*kg] at t₁ and 22 ± 6 ml/[min*kg] at t₂; P ≤ 0.001) was observed within the tele-intervention group patients; overall they did better than the no tele-intervention group ( P = 0.032). Dividing the incremental cost (-€878/patient) by the differential incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (0.22 QALYs) yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -€3993/QALY. Conclusions A combined telerehabilitation and centre-based programme, followed by transitional telerehabilitation induced persistent health benefits and remained cost-efficient up to 2 years after the end of the intervention. A partial decline of the benefits originally achieved did occur once the tele-intervention ended. Healthcare professionals should reflect on how innovative cost-efficient care models could be implemented in standard care. Future research should focus on key behaviour change techniques in technology-based interventions that enable full persistence of long-term behaviour change and health benefits. This study is registered in the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN29243064).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frederix et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: