Why the study?
What are the effects and therapeutic potential of neutral endopeptidase inhibition, alone or in combination with other agents, for the treatment of heart failure and hypertension?
What are the effects and therapeutic potential of neutral endopeptidase inhibition, alone or in combination with other agents, for the treatment of heart failure and hypertension?
While neutral endopeptidase inhibition alone lacks meaningful blood pressure-lowering efficacy, its combination with other renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors represents an important evolving strategy for treating heart failure and hypertension.
Neutral endopeptidase inhibition alone should not yet change practice; leaves open evaluation of combinations with ACE inhibitors or ARBs.
Hypertension and heart failure (HF) are common diseases that, despite advances in medical therapy, continue to be associated with high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, innovative therapeutic strategies are needed. Inhibition of the neutral endopeptidase (NEPinh) had been investigated as a potential novel therapeutic approach because of its ability to increase the plasma concentrations of the natriuretic peptides (NPs). Indeed, the NPs have potent natriuretic and vasodilator properties, inhibit the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, lower sympathetic drive, and have antiproliferative and antihypertrophic effects. Such potentially beneficial effects can be theoretically achieved by the use of NEPinh. However, studies have shown that NEPinh alone does not result in clinically meaningful blood pressure-lowering actions. More recently, NEPinh has been used in combination with other cardiovascular agents, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antagonists of the angiotensin receptor. Another future possible combination would be the use of NEPinh with NPs or their newly developed chimeric peptides. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the use and effects of NEPinh alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents for the treatment of human cardiovascular disease such as HF and hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangiafico et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: