Why the study?
Is the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire a valid and reliable measure of health status in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis?
Is the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire a valid and reliable measure of health status in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis?
The KCCQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing health status, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports KCCQ use for health status assessment in severe aortic stenosis; extends prior validation to this population.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnold et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: