Why the study?
Quantifying aortic valve stenosis severity with echocardiography is challenging in subgroups like low-flow low-gradient or paradoxical low-gradient AS, where underestimating severity may delay management.
Does aortic valve calcium scoring by computed tomography improve the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity in challenging cases?
Does aortic valve calcium scoring by computed tomography improve the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity in challenging cases?
CT-derived aortic valve calcium scoring is a valuable adjunct to echocardiography for resolving clinical uncertainty in grading aortic stenosis severity, particularly in low-flow, low-gradient presentations.
Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is increasing in prevalence due to the aging population, and severe AS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography remains the mainstay for the initial detection and diagnosis of AS, as well as for grading of severity. However, there are important subgroups of patients, for example, patients with low-flow low-gradient or paradoxical low-gradient AS, where quantification of severity of AS is challenging by echocardiography and underestimation of severity may delay appropriate management and impart a worse prognosis. Aortic valve calcium score by computed tomography has emerged as a useful clinical diagnostic test that is complimentary to echocardiography, particularly in cases where there may be conflicting data or clinical uncertainty about the degree of AS. In these situations, aortic valve calcium scoring may help re-stratify grading of severity and, therefore, further direct clinical management. This review presents the evolution of aortic valve calcium score by computed tomography, its diagnostic and prognostic value, as well as its utility in clinical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scalia et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: