Why the study?
The clinical utility of heart rate variability needed exploration by investigating its interrelationship with clinical measures of depressive and anxious symptoms.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Participants who reported depressive and anxious symptoms
Comparison
Clinician-rated and self-rated depression vs only self-rated depression vs clinician- and self-rated anxiety vs only self-rated anxiety
HRV differences by depression rating method warrant interpretive caution now; leaves open its clinical utility for symptom assessment.
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a known psychophysiological marker for diverse psychiatric symptoms. In this study, we aimed to explore the potential for clinical use of HRV by investigating the interrelationship between HRV indices and clinical measures mainly used to assess depressive and anxious symptoms. Participants who reported depressive and anxious symptoms were designated into the following groups: group 1, clinician-rated and self-rated depression; group 2, only self-rated depression; group 3, clinician-rated and self-rated anxiety; group 4, only self-rated anxiety. Statistical comparisons were performed between these groups to investigate the association between HRV and clinical measures. As a result, HRV variables showed significant correlations only with the clinician-rated assessments. Moreover, both time and frequency domain HRV indices were significantly different between groups 1 and 2, but groups 3 and 4 showed significant differences only in frequency domain HRV indices. Our study showed that HRV is an objective indicator for depressive or anxious symptoms. Additionally, it is considered a potential indicator for predicting the severity or state of depressive symptoms rather than of anxious symptoms. This study will contribute to increasing the diagnostic utility of discriminating those symptoms based on HRV in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ham et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: