PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2013New England Journal of Medicine858 citationsOpen Access

Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block and Systolic Dysfunction

View Full Paper
ACAnne B. CurtisSWSeth J. WorleyPAPhilip B. Adamson

Key Points

  • To evaluate whether biventricular pacing is superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
  • Interventional clinical trial (BLOCK HF, ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00267098) funded by Medtronic.

Structured PICO

Does biventricular pacing improve outcomes compared to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with NYHA class I-III heart failure?

P
Population
Patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with NYHA class I, II, or III heart failure
I
Intervention
Biventricular pacing
C
Comparator
Conventional right ventricular pacing

Biventricular pacing is superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with AV block, LV systolic dysfunction, and mild-to-moderate heart failure.

Abstract

Biventricular pacing was superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with NYHA class I, II, or III heart failure. (Funded by Medtronic; BLOCK HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00267098.).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Curtis et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d575356e4506aa303c144bhttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1210356
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper