Why the study?
Ivabradine's role and molecular mechanisms in improving heart failure remain unclear, making updated insights necessary for future study design.
Does ivabradine improve cardiac remodeling and heart failure outcomes?
Does ivabradine improve cardiac remodeling and heart failure outcomes?
This review highlights the pleiotropic, antiremodeling effects of ivabradine in heart failure, independent of its heart-rate-reducing properties, though its exact molecular mechanisms require further elucidation.
Ivabradine’s antiremodeling effects in HF models merit human trials; should not change practice until confirmed.
Cardiac remodeling can cause ventricular dysfunction and progress to heart failure, a cardiovascular disease that claims many lives globally. Ivabradine, a funny channel (If) inhibitor, is used in patients with chronic heart failure as an adjunct to other heart failure medications. This review aims to gather updated information regarding the therapeutic use and mechanism of action of ivabradine in heart failure. The drug reduces elevated resting heart rate, which is linked to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Its use is associated with improved cardiac function, structure, and quality of life in the patients. Ivabradine exerts several pleiotropic effects, including an antiremodeling property, which are independent of its principal heart-rate-reducing effects. Its suppressive effects on cardiac remodeling have been demonstrated in animal models of cardiac remodeling and heart failure. It reduces myocardial fibrosis, apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress as well as increases autophagy in the animals. It also modulates myocardial calcium homeostasis, neurohumoral systems, and energy metabolism. However, its role in improving heart failure remains unclear. Therefore, elucidating its molecular mechanisms is imperative and would aid in the design of future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamisah et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: