PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2019Vascular Health and Risk Management475 citationsOpen Access

Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives

SASüleyman AydınKUKader UğurSASuna Aydın

Key Points

  • This work focuses on assessing the benefits and drawbacks of various biomarkers for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction.
  • Evaluation of routine enzymatic and nonenzymatic biomarkers.

Structured PICO

What are the advantages, disadvantages, and translational challenges of routine and candidate biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
I
Intervention
Routine enzymatic and nonenzymatic biomarkers, and other candidate biomarkers
O
Outcome
Diagnosis of AMI

This review summarizes the current landscape, advantages, and translational challenges of established and emerging biomarkers for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction.

Abstract

We evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of routine enzymatic and nonenzymatic biomarkers and the literature evidence of other candidate biomarkers in the diagnosis of AMI, and discuss challenges and constraints that limit translational use from bench to bedside.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aydın et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d575e8493d9d40f84426bbhttps://doi.org/10.2147/vhrm.s166157
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper