Why the study?
Does postmortem serum cardiac troponin T (cTnT) concentration differentiate between cardiac and noncardiac causes of sudden death in autopsied subjects?
Does postmortem serum cardiac troponin T (cTnT) concentration differentiate between cardiac and noncardiac causes of sudden death in autopsied subjects?
Postmortem serum cTnT levels are significantly elevated in sudden cardiac death, providing a useful diagnostic marker for ongoing myocardial damage when autopsy morphologic findings are inconclusive.
Postmortem cTnT may aid cause adjudication in equivocal sudden deaths; leaves open prospective validation of thresholds before routine forensic adoption.
Ischemic heart disease is the most common cause of sudden death of natural causes in most western countries. By autopsy, there may be no gross or histologic evidence of acute myocardial damage unless the patient survived for several hours following the event. Cardiac troponin in serum has become the recommended biochemical marker for myocardial injury in the clinical setting. We performed a prospective study on 102 autopsied subjects at the Central Hospital of Rogaland, Stavanger, Norway. Femoral blood was sampled for subsequent analysis of cardiac troponin T (cTnT). In the subjects with morphologic evidence of recent myocardial injury (n = 34), the mean serum cTnT level was 1.95 microg/L compared with 0.16 microg/L in the subjects with a noncardiac cause of death (n = 35) and 0.61 microg/L in the group with probable sudden cardiac death without morphologic signs of acute myocardial injury (n = 33). The observed differences in mean serum cTnT levels between the groups were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). These data suggest that elevated postmortem serum concentration of cTnT reflects ongoing myocardial damage and may support a diagnosis of cardiac-related death in cases associated with sparse or inconclusive morphologic findings postmortem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellingsen et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: