Analysis examines how corporate governance affects earnings management in India, suggesting the need for regulatory reforms.
Purpose To examine whether, and the extent to which, corporate governance impacts earnings management in India. Design/methodology/approach The study utilises an unbalanced panel of 3,271 listed non-finance companies in India spanning 2010–2022. A comprehensive corporate governance index (CGI), encompassing 21 attributes, has been constructed and further categorised into substantive alignment and structural oversight dimensions. Fixed-effects regression with robust standard errors and instrumental variable (IV-2SLS) techniques have been employed. Findings The CGI exhibits a significant positive association with AEM, suggesting that structural dimensions often act as a legitimacy shield, thereby allowing firms to establish regulatory credibility while navigating accounting grey areas. Conversely, substantive alignment mechanisms – specifically, auditor quality and insider ownership – significantly constrain manipulation. The moderating role of market concentration is largely insignificant; however, endogeneity-corrected models suggest a weakening of the legitimacy shield in highly concentrated markets for AEM. Research limitations/implications The significant positive CGI-AEM link and insignificant association with REM highlight the ineffectiveness of current frameworks. These findings necessitate a regulatory shift from structural “box-ticking” mandates toward substantive oversight and enforcement quality to prevent governance from serving as a mere facade for procedural legitimacy. Originality/value The study challenges the Agency Theory by demonstrating how “symbolic decoupling” in emerging markets allows governance to serve as a facade for compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: