Demonstrates a closed governance loop optimizing model routing using production data, indicating substantial governance implications.
Multi-agent LLM systems deploy model routing — the assignment of operations to specific model tiers (e.g., Sonnet, Haiku, Opus) — based on intuition or static rules established at deployment time. These rules are never systematically updated from production evidence. This paper presents a closed governance loop that connects production session observability, quasi-experimental impact analysis, operation criticality classification, model routing, and economic circuit breaking into a continuously self-calibrating architecture. The synthesis draws on five companion works in the Gallora Lab series and introduces a calibration algorithm grounded in empirical production data (session of 2026-04-03: 278,730 output tokens, $36.74 total cost, 94.2% cache hit rate, 19 artifacts produced). The central empirical finding is that cache architecture dominates cost with 9× leverage while model tier selection has approximately 1.1× leverage on output tokens — which represent only 0.43% of effective token volume. The governance implication is counterintuitive: optimize cache architecture first, then calibrate model routing from quality evidence rather than cost assumptions. Four reclassification triggers, a conservative minimum-evidence protocol (N ≥ 30 before any downgrade), and six interface specifications are defined for implementing the loop in production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: