Numerical tests of mechanisms to bridge the Koide parameter gap reveal significant limitations in standard models.
Tejinder P. Singh’s electroweak-scale Koide parameter K_th = 0.66916 departs from the PUH low-energy value Q_PDG = 0.66666051 by Δ +0.002499. We test whether renormalization group running can bridge this gap. Three mechanisms are tested numerically: dielectric scaling of the Z3 breaking parameter ε; standard QED logarithmic mass running; and geometric differential running with anomalous dimensions fixed by E8 lattice weights. All three fail — producing |ΔQ| less than 10⁻⁴, three orders of magnitude below the required shift — and standard QED running moves Q in the wrong direction. The conclusion is that Singh’s K_th is not a renormalization scale effect on pole masses. It is an algebraic quantity from Jordan algebra eigenvalues before mass identification. Theorem 171 establishes: (1) PUH’s Z3 breaking ε = -9.62×10⁻⁶ and Singh’s triality breaking are different geometric objects at different algebraic levels; (2) the correct bridge is a geometric map from Jordan eigenvalues to E8 lattice mode frequencies, not RG running; (3) the derivation of ΔQ = 0.002499 from E8 geometry in closed form is identified as the key open calculation connecting PUH to Singh’s framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brian Martell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: