This work demonstrates improvements in natural language inference accuracy, indicating potential for reliable predictions.
We extend the Livnium attractor-based NLI system with three contributions: (1) a cross-encoder upgrade improving SNLI dev accuracy from 82.2% to 84.5% via joint [CLS] premise [SEP] hypothesis [SEP] encoding; (2) token-level alignment extraction from the last-layer BERT cross-attention block, rendering the model's internal structural comparison visible as a force map between premise and hypothesis tokens; and (3) an alignment divergence metric that serves as a zero-cost intrinsic reliability signal, with empirically validated thresholds distinguishing stable from unreliable predictions. We further demonstrate that the same constraint-injection mechanism reproduces the Bayesian belief update in the Monty Hall problem, connecting NLI inference to classical decision theory through a unified energy-reshaping framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetan Patil (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: