Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory pilot study examines bias perceptions in pre-service teachers, suggesting need for critical AI literacy training.
The increasing integration of Generative AI (GenAI) into higher education, particularly in the domain of language teaching, presents both opportunities and challenges. While AI-powered tools such as ChatGPT-5 can support language learning by generating personalised content which enables real-time interaction and feedback, they also risk perpetuating biases embedded in training data. These biases can appear in linguistic, cultural or socio-political forms, reinforcing stereotypes and influencing language norms. Therefore, equipping students and educators with strategies to critically assess AI outputs is essential for ethical and responsible AI use in language education. While recent research highlights the risks of algorithmic bias, less attention has been given to the perceptions and attitudes of pre-service teachers, whose future practice will shape classroom uses of these technologies. This exploratory pilot study adopts a survey-based approach to examine pre-service teachers’ baseline awareness of bias in artificial intelligence, with particular attention to linguistic and cultural dimensions Data were collected through an online questionnaire administered to 65 undergraduate students enrolled in Primary Education degree programmes. The study documents baseline perceptions prior to any instructional intervention and provides preliminary empirical evidence to inform the future design of pedagogical strategies aimed at developing critical AI literacy in teacher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ribes-Lafoz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: