Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A framework supports diagnostic improvement in customer experiences across sectors, indicating its broad applicability.
Purpose This study aims to develop a structured analytical framework that extends the conventional descriptive use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) toward diagnostic, confirmatory and institutionalized customer experience improvement. Design/methodology/approach A reproducible analytical-computational framework with four stages is proposed: Observe (control charts and capability analysis), Explore (causal segmentation using Gini-weighted decision trees, conditional probabilities and the Five Whys method), Confirm (non-parametric hypothesis testing with bootstrap procedures) and Institutionalize (standardization through structured templates and pedagogical strategies). The framework was validated in two organizational contexts, one service-based and one manufacturing-based. Findings The results of this study demonstrate that the proposed framework enables organizations to move from static NPS measurement toward a structured analytical workflow that supports diagnostic explanation, formal validation of interventions and systematic organizational learning. Across both cases, the framework showed methodological robustness, cross-sector applicability and pedagogical value. Originality/value This study offers a novel analytical–computational framework that transforms NPS from a passive indicator into a dynamic mechanism for explaining, validating and institutionalizing customer experience improvements. By integrating exploratory, confirmatory and learning-oriented analytics within a unified structure, the framework advances the methodological role of NPS in both customer experience research and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rave et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: