Examines land surface temperature consistency in Malta, indicating the importance of multi-sensor data for thermal analysis.
This study examines land surface temperature (LST) variability over Malta, a small island in the central Mediterranean, using satellite observations compared with in situ near-surface air temperature (NSAT) measurements. The analysis focuses on the comparison between satellite-derived LST and local atmospheric thermal conditions for urban and rural land cover types. LST data from Landsat-8, MODIS (Terra and Aqua), and Sentinel-3A and 3B were analysed over a six-month period (September 2024 to February 2025). Monthly morning and evening field campaigns were conducted at 19 monitoring sites distributed across the island, during which NSAT, relative humidity, wind speed, and wind direction were recorded. Morning comparisons showed strong correlations between satellite-derived LST and in situ NSAT, i.e., Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, in the range of 0.82–0.85. Landsat-8 exhibited a slight positive bias (+1.04 °C), while MODIS and Sentinel-3 Level-2 products showed negative biases (−3.82 °C and −1.89 °C, respectively). Nighttime comparisons revealed larger negative biases for MODIS (−6.91 °C) and Sentinel-3 (−6.89 °C). After empirical-based harmonisation, these discrepancies were reduced to near-zero mean bias, maintaining strong correlations. Spatial analysis indicated a persistent nocturnal urban heat island (UHI) effect, with urban areas retaining more heat than rural zones. Morning patterns showed seasonal modulation: during late summer and early autumn, rural areas exhibited higher surface temperatures due to sparse vegetation and exposed soils, whereas during cooler months the urban signal became more pronounced as vegetation recovery enhanced rural cooling. Overall, the results demonstrate the usefulness of multi-sensor satellite observations, interpreted alongside ground-based measurements for characterising thermal behaviour in small island environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woollard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: