Fatigue induces decline in propulsive force during swimming, suggesting implications for performance.
Objective: The effects of fatigue on swimming propulsion are unclear. This study examined upper-limb propulsive force and bilateral coordination during constant-speed front crawl performed until exhaustion. Methods: Twelve competitive swimmers completed a visually paced front-crawl trial performed at a constant speed (95% of maximal speed) until volitional exhaustion. Upper-limb propulsion (pressure-derived) was quantified using wearable differential-pressure mini-paddles synchronized with high-speed video. Propulsive force and impulse were analyzed at ten standardized time points (10–100% of test duration), distinguishing the early (entry–catch–pull) phase and the push phase of the stroke cycle. Results: Total overall propulsive impulse (time-integral of propulsive force) and mean propulsive force decreased significantly as early as 30–40% of test duration, with the largest reductions occurring during the push phase. Interestingly, push-phase impulse declined earlier in the non-dominant left arm (from 20% of test duration) compared to the dominant right arm (from 40%), whereas force generated during the early phase did not change. Peak propulsive force decreased at later stages, while intra-cycle timing indices (peak timing and force centroid) and inter-limb asymmetry remained unchanged. Stroke frequency increased from mid-test onward and was strongly negatively associated with stroke efficiency (r = −0.79). Stroke efficiency correlated positively with push-phase impulse and peak force. Conclusions: During constant-speed front crawl performed to exhaustion, propulsion progressively declines, primarily through reduced force and impulse during the push phase rather than changes in the early (entry–catch–pull) phase or temporal and asymmetry-related variables. Increased stroke frequency initially compensates for declining propulsion but ultimately fails to maintain the imposed swimming velocity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puce et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: