Comparison of two assessment tools reveals significant correlations in fundamental movement skills among children, indicating reliable evaluation methods.
Background: In response to China’s recent educational policies mandating a focus on fundamental movement skills (FMS) in school physical education, this study investigated the convergent validity between two widely used FMS assessment tools: the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) and the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA). Methods: A random sample of 134 9–10-year-old children were tested with both the CAMSA and the TGMD-3. Results: The outcomes from both the TGMD-3 and the CAMSA revealed a superiority in object-control skills among boys compared to girls, with a significant correlation between the two (r = 0.265–0.482, p < 0.01). Additionally, the Kappa correlation coefficient between the CAMSA and the TGMD-3 was 0.395, while the Kappa correlation coefficient between the CAMSA total skill and the TGMD-3 was 0.654. Conclusions: Both assessment tools effectively identified gender disparities in FMS, demonstrating correlation and consistency within acceptable ranges. Considering the slight variations in scoring methods, it is recommended to employ a variety of assessment tools in future evaluations of children’s FMS to enhance the overall comprehensiveness of the assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: