Advanced modality imaging evaluation in acute ischemic stroke may lead to delayed endovascular reperfusion therapy without improvement in clinical outcomes

Kevin N. Sheth; John B. Terry; Raul G. Nogueira; Anat Horev; Thanh N. Nguyen; Albert K Fong; Dheeraj Gandhi; Shyam Prabhakaran; Dolora Wisco; Brenda A Glenn; Ashis Tayal; Bryan Ludwig; Muhammad Shazam Hussain; Tudor G. Jovin; Paul F Clemmons; Carolyn Cronin; David S. Liebeskind; Melissa Tian; Rishi Gupta

doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010512

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

The current retrospective study shows that multimodal imaging may be associated with delays in treatment without reducing hemorrhage rates or improving clinical outcomes. This exploratory analysis suggests that prospective randomised studies are warranted to support the hypothesis that advanced modality imaging is superior to NCT in improving clinical outcomes.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Sheth et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6d0fe639f29d8dcab3618 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010512

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Advanced modality imaging evaluation in acute ischemic stroke may lead to delayed endovascular reperfusion therapy without improvement in clinical outcomes

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Advanced modality imaging evaluation in acute ischemic stroke may lead to delayed endovascular reperfusion therapy without improvement in clinical outcomes

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading