Current manual and automated assessment tools for robotic surgery lack sufficient validation for use in accreditation.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Manual and automated assessment tools for robotic surgery are not well validated and require further evaluation before use in accreditation processes.PROSPERO: registration ID CRD42022304901.
Clinicians should avoid unvalidated tools for robotic surgery accreditation; systematic review leaves open the need for rigorous validation studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boal et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: