Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: To validate the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire developed by Parmenter and Wardle (1999) in an Australian community sample. This questionnaire differs from previous assessments of knowledge because it incorporates a broad range of nutrition concepts, including knowledge of dietary recommendations, healthy food choices, nutrient sources and some diet–disease relationships. Methods: The original questionnaire was developed in the UK, and thus modified to suit the current Dietary Guidelines for Australians and current public health nutrition recommendations. A total of 156 people, of which 116 were community members, completed the questionnaire (113 items). As an indication of concurrent validity, a subsample of nutrition and dietetic students were included (n = 40). As a measure of test–retest reliability, a subsample (n = 57), including students and community members, answered the questionnaire on two occasions, two weeks apart. Results: Both overall internal reliability of the questionnaire items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.87) were high. The nutrition and dietetic students, hypothesised to have higher knowledge levels, scored consistently higher than the general community sample, indicating good concurrent validity. Conclusion: A test of a modified version of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire found it to be a valid and reliable measure of nutrition knowledge, appropriate for use in a section of the Australian community. The validated tool may be used in the future for the comprehensive assessment of general nutrition knowledge; however, further testing in differing sections of Australian society may be warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hendrie et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: