June 18, 2010

Dual task interference in estimating the risk of falls and measuring change: a comparative, psychometric study of four measurements

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

The tests with dual task can be recommended because they possess high criterion validity and very good retest reliability. Faster and simpler performance of the TUG-DT is another factor in its favour.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Hofheinz et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6fa9b733a2b54c8aa87c3 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510367993

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis2007 · 437 citations
2Balance in elderly patients: the "get-up and go" test.1986 · 1,552 citations
3Der Geh-und-Zähl-Test: Ein einfacher Test zur Abschätzung des Sturzrisikos2008 · 16 citations
4Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.1979 · 23,041 citations
5The sensitivity and specificity of the Timed "Up & Go" and the Dynamic Gait Index for self-reported falls in persons with vestibular disorders.2004 · 166 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar