Theoretical analysis reveals shared systemic foundations between Waltz and Kant in international relations, suggesting a broader framework for interpreting the post-Cold War global order.
This article compares Waltz and Kant as theorists who explicitly advocate a systemic approach to international relations. Waltz and Kant are compared with respect to their views on the nature of systemic approaches, the composition and dynamics of the international system, and the relationship between the international system and world society. It is argued that there are deep underlying similarities between their views on the nature of systemic approaches to international relations that may facilitate a much broader account of the international system. A final section examines the relevance of a Kantian view of the international system to the post-Cold War era by comparing its insights to those offered by neorealist and classical realist perspectives. …the best way to understand the writings of philosophers is to seek out the questions they were attempting to answer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ewan Harrison (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: