Why the study?
Are telerehabilitation programs as feasible and efficient as face-to-face physiotherapy for improving functionality and quality of life?
Are telerehabilitation programs as feasible and efficient as face-to-face physiotherapy for improving functionality and quality of life?
Telerehabilitation is a viable alternative to traditional face-to-face physiotherapy, offering comparable outcomes in functionality, quality of life, and patient adherence.
Supports telerehabilitation adoption where access limits in-person care; confirms equivalence to conventional physiotherapy in systematic evidence.
this review generally concludes that intervention through telerehabilitation programs is as feasible and efficient as conventional physiotherapy in terms of functionality level and quality of life. In addition, telerehabilitation shows high levels of patients' satisfaction and adherence, being values equivalent to traditional rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muñoz-Tomás et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: