Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ru(II) complexes that undergo photosubstitution reactions from triplet metal-centered (³MC) excited states are of interest in photochemotherapy (PCT) due to their potential to produce cytotoxic effects in hypoxia. Dual-action systems that incorporate this stoichiometric mode to complement the oxygen-dependent photosensitization pathways that define photodynamic therapy (PDT) are poised to maintain antitumor activity regardless of the oxygenation status. Herein, we examine the way in which these two pathways influence photocytotoxicity in normoxia and in hypoxia using the [Ru(dmp)₂(IP-nT)]²⁺ series (where dmp = 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline and IP-nT = imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline tethered to n = 0-4 thiophene rings) to switch the dominant excited state from the metal-based ³MC state in the case of Ru-phen-Ru-1T to the ligand-based ³ILCT state for Ru-3T and Ru-4T. Ru-phen-Ru-1T, having dominant ³MC states and the largest photosubstitution quantum yields, are inactive in both normoxia and hypoxia. Ru-3T and Ru-4T, with dominant ³IL/³ILCT states and long triplet lifetimes (τTA = 20-25 μs), have the poorest photosubstitution quantum yields, yet are extremely active. In the best instances, Ru-4T exhibit attomolar phototoxicity toward SKMEL28 cells in normoxia and picomolar in hypoxia, with phototherapeutic index values in normoxia of 10⁵-10¹² and 10³-10⁶ in hypoxia. While maximizing excited-state deactivation through photodissociative ³MC states did not result in bonafide dual-action PDT/PCT agents, the study has produced the most potent photosensitizer we know of to date. The extraordinary photosensitizing capacity of Ru-3T and Ru-4T may stem from a combination of very efficient ¹O₂ production and possibly complementary type I pathways via ³ILCT excited states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roque et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: