Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The findings suggest that severe childhood abuse is associated with abnormally increased activation in classical dorsomedial frontal error-processing regions; furthermore, the increased activation in the supplementary motor area was abuse specific. However, childhood abuse was not associated with inhibitory dysfunction. Increased sensitivity of error-detection networks in participants in the childhood abuse group may be due to the constant need to monitor their own actions in order to avoid painful mistakes, which are often associated with harsh punishment in abusive settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: