What question did this study set out to answer?

This analysis critiques existing strategies for achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research, emphasizing their historical context and effectiveness.

July 16, 2015Qualitative Health Research

Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

JMJanice M. MorseUniversity of Utah

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Critical analysis examines strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research, indicating their impact remains unclear.

Key Points

This analysis critiques existing strategies for achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research, emphasizing their historical context and effectiveness.
Critically examine strategies introduced by Guba and Lincoln for establishing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry.
Review recommendations for improving rigor including prolonged engagement and triangulation.
Propose a return to traditional terminology like rigor and reliability for clarity.
Identified a lack of critical examination of the trustworthiness strategies over the last four decades.
Proposed a clear framework for the appropriate use of identified strategies to enhance research quality.
Suggested returning to social science terminology could improve clarity and understanding in qualitative research.

Cite This Study

Janice M. Morse (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d75733f182769aa8b8a617 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider