Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The motivation of this paper is that the effect of landscape pattern information on the accuracy of particulate matter estimation is seldom reported. The landscape pattern indexes were incorporated in a land use regression (LUR) model to investigate the performance of PM2.5 simulation over Zhejiang Province. The study results show that the prediction accuracy of the model has been improved significantly after the incorporation of the landscape pattern indexes. At class-level, waters and residential areas were clearly landscape components influencing decreasing or increasing PM2.5 concentration. At landscape-level, CONTAG (contagion index) played a huge negative role in pollutant concentrations. Latitude and relative humidity are key factors affecting the PM2.5 concentration at province level. If the land use regression model incorporating landscape pattern indexes was used to simulate distribution of PM2.5, the accuracy of ordinary kriging for the LUR-based data mining was higher than the accuracy of LUR-based ordinary kriging, especially in the area of low pollution concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: