This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This research provides empirical evidence of how the inadequate provision of interpreters forces the hand of healthcare staff to use shortcuts. Although this innovative 'tinkering' allows staff to get the job done, it risks normalising structural gaps in care provision for people with LEP. Policy-makers must rethink their approach to interpretation provision which prioritises costs over quality. We assert that the concept of language discrimination is a valuable framework for clinicians to better identify and articulate unfair treatment on the grounds of LEP.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomkow et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: