Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 26, 2019Internet Research

Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GFGeorge R. FrankeKiel UniversityMSMarko SarstedtGoethe University Frankfurt

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Franke et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d76b78db9d5e1bf4b8a48bhttps://doi.org/10.1108/intr-12-2017-0515
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation2001 · 348 citations
  2. 2A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling2014 · 37,450 citations
  3. 3User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View12003 · 44,901 citations
  4. 4Effect of digital transformation on organisational performance of SMEs2016 · 189 citations
  5. 5Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.1959 · 17,294 citations