Computational analysis reveals pH-driven transitions between sequential and concerted proton-electron transfers in cobalt porphyrins, indicating how acidity controls catalytic efficiency.
Herein we investigate computationally in detail the mechanism of the formation of the carboxylate adduct during the electroreduction of CO₂ in water catalysed by cobalt porphyrin complexes. Specifically, we address qualitatively the competition between the concerted and sequential pathways for the proton-coupled electron transfer. We use a simple methodology for accurate computation of the pKa of the neutral and anionic carboxylate intermediates, [CoP-COOH] and [CoP-COOH]⁻ (where CoP is a cobalt porphine complex), based on the isodesmic proton-exchange reaction scheme. The predicted values are used as in input for a theoretical model that describes the transition between the sequential and concerted pathways. The activation of the sequential pathway (ET-PT) that leads to the formation of the neutral [CoP-COOH] intermediate at pH ≈ 3.5 (pKa[CoP-COOH] = 3.5 ± 0.4), as predicted by the calculations, is in good agreement with the drastic increase in the faradaic efficiency of the CO₂ reduction reaction towards CO at pH = 3 compared to pH = 1, as experimentally observed. This confirms the existence of the CO₂ anionic adduct [CoP-CO₂]⁻ as a viable intermediate at pH = 3 and its crucial role for the pH dependence of the faradaic efficiency for the CO₂ reduction. The analysis also shows that when the pH is significantly higher than the pKa of the neutral carboxylate adduct, the CO₂ reduction has to go through an alternative pathway with the formation of the anionic carboxylate intermediate [CoP-COOH]⁻. It is formed through a concerted proton-electron transfer step from the anionic CO₂ adduct [CoP-CO₂]⁻ when the pH is below ∼8.6 (pKa[CoP-COOH]⁻ = 8.6 ± 0.4). At pH ≈ 8.6 and above, another decoupled ET-PT is predicted to take place, leading to the formation of a dianionic CO₂ adduct [CoP-CO₂]²⁻.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Göttle et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: