Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 8, 2021Annals of Intensive CareOpen Access

Most predictors of fluid responsiveness reliably predict the response of cardiac output to volume expansion, although technical and clinical variables influence their operative performance.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Do predictors of fluid responsiveness reliably predict the response of cardiac output to volume expansion in adult critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes?

Population

Adult patients mechanically ventilated at tidal volumes ≤ 8 ml kg-1

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

JSJorge Iván Alvarado SánchezJRJuan Daniel Caicedo RuizJFJuan José Diaztagle Fernández

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports cautious use of fluid responsiveness predictors during low-tidal-volume ventilation; confirms reliability while highlighting technical and clinical performance modifiers.

Structured PICO

Do predictors of fluid responsiveness reliably predict the response of cardiac output to volume expansion in adult critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes?

P
Population
Adult critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at tidal volumes ≤ 8 ml kg⁻¹
I
Intervention
Predictors of fluid responsiveness
O
Outcome
Response of cardiac output to volume expansionsurrogate

Predictors of fluid responsiveness are generally reliable in critically ill adults ventilated at low tidal volumes, though their performance is affected by technical and clinical variables.

Cite This Study

Sánchez et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d775689c65a8c80448f527https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00817-5
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share