Why the study?
Cachexia is associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure, but the mechanisms by which it triggers disease progression, including dysregulation of myokines from wasting skeletal muscle, remain poorly understood.
Does skeletal muscle-derived Musclin overexpression attenuate cardiac dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis during pressure overload?
Does skeletal muscle-derived Musclin overexpression attenuate cardiac dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis during pressure overload?
Skeletal muscle-derived Musclin protects against cardiac dysfunction and fibrosis during pressure overload, suggesting its augmentation could be a novel therapeutic strategy for heart failure associated with cachexia.
Musclin may protect against pressure-overload remodeling in animals; leaves open therapeutic augmentation in human cachexia-associated HF.
Cachexia is associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure patients, but the underlying mechanisms of cachexia triggered disease progression remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate whether the dysregulation of myokine expression from wasting skeletal muscle exaggerates heart failure. RNA sequencing from wasting skeletal muscles of mice with heart failure reveals a reduced expression of Ostn, which encodes the secreted myokine Musclin, previously implicated in the enhancement of natriuretic peptide signaling. By generating skeletal muscle specific Ostn knock-out and overexpressing mice, we demonstrate that reduced skeletal muscle Musclin levels exaggerate, while its overexpression in muscle attenuates cardiac dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis during pressure overload. Mechanistically, Musclin enhances the abundance of C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), thereby promoting cardiomyocyte contractility through protein kinase A and inhibiting fibroblast activation through protein kinase G signaling. Because we also find reduced OSTN expression in skeletal muscle of heart failure patients, augmentation of Musclin might serve as therapeutic strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szaroszyk et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: