Why the study?
Does zero-fluoroscopy ICE and CartoSound-guided ablation improve safety and feasibility in patients undergoing PVI for atrial fibrillation compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation?
Does zero-fluoroscopy ICE and CartoSound-guided ablation improve safety and feasibility in patients undergoing PVI for atrial fibrillation compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation?
Zero-fluoroscopy ICE and CartoSound-guided ablation appears to be a safe and feasible alternative to conventional fluoroscopy for atrial fibrillation pulmonary vein isolation.
May offer radiation-free AF ablation in experienced centers; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm safety and efficacy.
Zero-fluoroscopy ICE and CartoSound-guided AF ablation may be safe and feasible in patients undergoing PVI compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfredo Pantano (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: