This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Dark Web, a hidden segment of the internet, has become a hub for illicit activities, facilitated by various forms of digital identification (IDs) such as email addresses, Telegram accounts, and cryptocurrency wallets. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the Dark Web’s identification and communication patterns, focusing on the roles of different ID types and their associated activities. Using a dataset of Dark Web documents, we construct and analyze a bipartite network to model the relationships between IDs and web documents, employing graph–theoretical metrics such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, and k-core decomposition, while analyzing subnetworks formed by ID type. Our findings reveal that Telegram forms the backbone of the network, serving as the primary communication tool for hacking-related activities, particularly within Russian-speaking communities. In contrast, email plays a more decentralized role, facilitating finance–crypto and other activities but with a high level of fragmentation and English as the predominant language. XMR (Monero) wallets emerge as a key component in financial transactions, forming a cohesive subnetwork focused on cryptocurrency-related activities. The analysis also highlights the modular and hierarchical nature of the Dark Web, with distinct clusters for hacking, finance–crypto, and drugs–narcotics, often operating independently but with some cross-topic interactions. This study provides a foundation for understanding the Dark Web’s structure and dynamics, offering insights that can inform strategies for monitoring and mitigating its risks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
de‐Marcos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: