This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Summary estimates of treatment effect from random effects meta-analysis give only the average effect across all studies. Inclusion of prediction intervals, which estimate the likely effect in an individual setting, could make it easier to apply the results to clinical practice
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riley et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: