This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A major challenge in the development of anticancer therapies is the considerable time and resources needed for conducting randomized clinical trials (RCT). There is a need for more efficient RCT designs that accelerate development, minimize costs, and make trials more appealing to patients. We review the statistical and logistical characteristics of multi-arm designs that compare several experimental treatments to a common control arm. In particular, we present a rationale for not requiring multiplicity adjustment in multi-arm trials that are designed for logistical efficiency. Relative to conducting separate RCTs for each experimental agent, this multi-arm design is shown to require a lower total sample size than multiple two-arm trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freidlin et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: