Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
From 2003 to 2016, incidence rates of treated ESKD were relatively stable in many higher income countries but rose substantially predominantly in East and Southeast Asia. The prevalence of treated ESKD has increased worldwide, likely due to improving ESKD survival, population demographic shifts, higher prevalence of ESKD risk factors, and increasing KRT access in countries with growing economies. Unadjusted 5-year survival of ESKD patients on KRT was 41% in the USA, 48% in Europe, and 60% in Japan. Dialysis is the predominant KRT in most countries, with hemodialysis being the most common modality. Variations in dialysis practice patterns account for some of the differences in survival outcomes globally. Worldwide, there is a greater prevalence of KRT at higher income levels, and the number of people who die prematurely because of lack of KRT access is estimated at up to 3 times higher than the number who receive treatment. Key Messages: Many people worldwide in need of KRT as a life-sustaining treatment do not receive it, mostly in LMICs where health care resources are severely limited. This large treatment gap demands a focus on population-based prevention strategies and development of affordable and cost-effective KRT. Achieving global equity in KRT access will require concerted efforts in advocating effective public policy, health care delivery, workforce capacity, education, research, and support from the government, private sector, nongovernmental, and professional organizations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John S. Thurlow
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Megha Joshi
Naval Medical Research Command
Guofen Yan
University of Virginia
American Journal of Nephrology
National Institutes of Health
University of California, Los Angeles
University of Virginia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thurlow et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7b965b1cb92dd1bb8bc7f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000514550