Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 13, 2005Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GWGregory L. WarrenPlatelet BioGenesis (United States)CAC. Webster AndrewsResearch Triangle Park FoundationACAnna‐Maria CapelliGlaxoSmithKline (Italy)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Warren et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7beb905ee2ba81dbed9eahttps://doi.org/10.1021/jm050362n
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high‐throughput screening: A case study on small‐molecule inhibitors of angiogenin2002 · 99 citations
  2. 2Glide:  A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy2004 · 10,184 citations
  3. 3Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy2004 · 572 citations
  4. 4Assessing Scoring Functions for Protein−Ligand Interactions2004 · 484 citations