The HOOS 2.0 appears to be useful for the evaluation of patient-relevant outcome after THR and is more responsive than the WOMAC LK 3.0. The added subscales sport and recreation function and hip related quality of life were highly responsive for this group of patients, with the responsiveness being highest for those younger than 66.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilsdotter et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: