Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 3, 2006European Heart JournalOpen Access

Depression as an aetiologic and prognostic factor in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of 6362 events among 146 538 participants in 54 observational studies

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Is depression an independent aetiologic and prognostic factor for coronary heart disease?

Population

146,538 participants across 54 observational studies

Design

Meta-analysis

Authors

ANAndrew NicholsonVA NY Harbor Healthcare SystemHKHannah KuperUniversity of LondonHarry HemingwayHarry HemingwayPreventive Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

The independent role of depression as a risk factor for coronary heart disease remains unestablished due to confounding by conventional risk factors and disease severity in existing observational studies.

Key Points

  • To assess whether depression should be considered an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD).
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 54 observational studies involving 146,538 participants.
  • Analyzed 6,362 events related to coronary heart disease and depression.
  • Reviewed the impact of conventional risk factors and severity of coronary disease on the outcomes.
  • Depression's status as an independent risk factor for CHD remains unclear due to bias in the existing studies.
  • Incomplete adjustments for traditional risk factors were found to affect the interpretation of the data.

Structured PICO

Is depression an independent aetiologic and prognostic factor for coronary heart disease?

P
Population
146,538 participants across 54 observational studies
I
Intervention
Depression
O
Outcome
Coronary heart disease eventshard clinical

The independent role of depression as a risk factor for coronary heart disease remains unestablished due to confounding by conventional risk factors and disease severity in existing observational studies.

Limitations

  • incomplete and biased availability of adjustment for conventional risk factors and severity of coronary disease

Cite This Study

Nicholson et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7cadeec32c73b01ae2ad1https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl338
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Depressive symptoms and outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting2001 · 101 citations
  2. 2Affective disorders and survival after acute myocardial infarction * Results from the post-infarction late potential study1991 · 301 citations
  3. 3Psychological factors and survival in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST): a reexamination1997 · 96 citations
  4. 4Psychosocial predictors of mortality in 83 women with premature acute myocardial infarction.1993 · 55 citations
  5. 5A Psychological Study of Survivors and Nonsurvivors of Myocardial Infarction1969 · 92 citations