Bedwetting, behaviour and self‐esteem: a review of the literature

Fifteen empirical studies matched the inclusion criteria. There was only one randomised-controlled trial and the rest of the studies were cohort, case-control or cross-sectional design. Evidence of sample bias predominantly due to the use hospital-based and/or 'volunteer' subjects was found in five studies. A further five studies used birth cohort data, which excludes important variables such as the impact of treatment. Four studies used single parent-reported measures, which may under or over-estimate the problem. No large cohort studies were available which compare the self-esteem of bedwetting children with matched controls. The most interesting line of enquiry is pursued by studies looking at whether self-esteem improves with successful treatment. However, the use of self-selected subject groups does not make the current evidence convincing and more work is required to determine outcomes for all children. There is empirical evidence for increased behavioural problems in bedwetting children. Studies conducted on younger children report less behavioural problems with more reported in studies conducted on older children with complex wetting disorders. This may point towards wetting being the primary problem, but more work is needed, as causation in any direction is difficult to ascertain from the literature.