Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Considering the compensation of respiratory motion effects only, both affine and elastic based approaches led to an accurate resizing and positioning of the myocardium. The use of the diastolic phase combined with an affine model based respiratory motion correction may therefore be a simple approach leading to significant quality improvements in cardiac PET imaging. However, the best performance was obtained with the combined correction for both cardiac and respiratory movements considering all the dual-gated bins independently through the use of an elastic model based motion compensation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamare et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: